MInTheGap

Standing in the Gap in a Society that's Warring with God.

Mercy and Justice in Capital Punishment

February 28th, 2008 Visited 4475 times, 2 so far today
This entry is part 2 of 5 in the series Capital Punishment

Alone amongst the dead header

When you think “Capital Punishment” I bet the first thought that crosses your mind is not “mercy.” In fact, in Amanda’s opening statement she believes that sparing someone the death penalty is both merciful and just.

When I first started trying to respond to this line of thought, I had the problem of pinning down exactly what mercy means. In my mind it’s a shifting and subjective concept. But when we finally agreed on what it was, we came to the following:

Mercy is not getting what we deserve.

The problem with stating that Capital Punishment is both merciful and just is that you have to define what just is first.

Just

In order for you to say that it’s merciful to allow someone to live instead of sentencing them to death, you have to say that they deserve death. Stated slightly differently, the position that it’s merciful not to kill someone for a capital offense states, by definition, that it would be just to put them to death.

This presents a dilemma for Amanda’s point of view. Once you’ve moved the bar to say that it is just to give them life in prison, the bar for mercy then must move as well. Since the two are interlinked.

So, for example, if it is just to have them spend life behind bars, then mercy would either cut the sentence short (not give them the whole time they deserve) or would make their stay more pleasant.

Mercy

If we grant, for the moment, that it is just for them to lose their life for the capital offense, we are then faced with the question of whether it’s more merciful to have them spend their life behind bars or to kill them.

First, I would argue that it is more merciful on them to put them to death because of the living situations in which they would find themselves. Should they live their life out in solitary confinement, they would spend countless years living a shell of an existence. Since it is just that they be put to death, and they will die eventually, we are just extending their misery.

Also, while they are in solitary or permitted appeals their life is in question. The final outcome is not known. There’s still the chance that they could escape or get parole. And don’t think that the inmate who has spent multiple years in solitary or in prison has not contemplated how they might get out– even if it’s a remote possibility.

Second, I would argue that it is more merciful on the families. The current system prolongs the agony while awaiting closure. The family deserves to have the situation finished. They were unjustly punished by the removal of their loved one, and yet the one that took the life still lives and has everything he needs for life provided for him. Food, clothing, shelter, exercise, for the rest of their lives. Provided by the state (something that also is unfair and a burden on the innocent).

Lastly, if the convict is a believer (or converts after being imprisoned), it would be more merciful to usher them into the presence of the Savior than to have them remain on this Earth in solitary or other confinement.

Conclusion

It is my belief that sparing someone Capital Punishment could be considered merciful or just, but not both. If just, then there has to be a reason why we should extend such mercy to someone that deserves to die. If unjust, then it’s not mercy that we’re extending, but just enforcing whatever we believe should be the greatest punishment.

Series Navigation<< Capital Punishment DebateWhat is Mercy? Who Decides What is Just? >>

Comments

5 Comments

RSS
  • Leticia says on: February 28, 2008 at 3:27 pm

     

    Wow! Great post.

    I am a supporter of Capital Punishment. I think there are too many inmates living on our tax dollars, and it should be spent somewhere else.

    Death by injection or however, is merciful, compared to what you had said about spending life in solitary confinement. I believe it would drive a person mad. And would we really want to risk an escape or parole of someone who is mentally incapacitated? No.

    Charles Manson should have been executed a long time ago. Look at the media attention this psychopath has? The families victims are still suffering.

  • Mary says on: February 29, 2008 at 1:25 pm

     

    I, too, am in favor of the death penalty. You make a great argument using the perspective of mercy that way.

    Mary’s last blog post..Real Life Homeschooling

  • MInTheGap says on: February 29, 2008 at 1:40 pm

     

    No one likes another human being to have to die– and yet we all will die, and if someone is going to take another’s life there has to be a just punishment.

  • Mary says on: January 20, 2011 at 8:18 am

     

    http://www.press.umich.edu/tit.....?id=328658

MInTheGap

Standing in the Gap in a Society that's Warring with God.

%d bloggers like this: