<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In the Bible, It Was Considered Being Barren</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/</link>
	<description>Standing in the Gap in a Society that's Warring with God.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 23:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buffy</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/comment-page-1/#comment-77982</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/#comment-77982</guid>
		<description>I think you have a point.  I don't mean we should never use science to help us at all.  But over the last 30 years or so we have often thrown caution to the winds and used all sorts of technologies to get us what we want and are only just realising that in some ways we have done a lot of damage.  I'm not saying it is wrong to have IVF but has sufficient research been done into the side-effects on a woman's health of taking all those drugs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you have a point.  I don&#8217;t mean we should never use science to help us at all.  But over the last 30 years or so we have often thrown caution to the winds and used all sorts of technologies to get us what we want and are only just realising that in some ways we have done a lot of damage.  I&#8217;m not saying it is wrong to have IVF but has sufficient research been done into the side-effects on a woman&#8217;s health of taking all those drugs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MInTheGap</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/comment-page-1/#comment-77974</link>
		<dc:creator>MInTheGap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/#comment-77974</guid>
		<description>There is nothing wrong with adoption.  Invitro I'm against because it creates multiple human beings to be disposed of as science experiments instead of the people that they are.

The point I was trying to get at with these posts is not that science and technology are bad and should be shunned (I mean, I do work with computers for a day job!), but that I believe that we as a society in general, and Christians in particular, have replaced a desire for God with a reliance on science.

"Science" is our new god.  And that is what I see is the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is nothing wrong with adoption.  Invitro I&#8217;m against because it creates multiple human beings to be disposed of as science experiments instead of the people that they are.</p>
<p>The point I was trying to get at with these posts is not that science and technology are bad and should be shunned (I mean, I do work with computers for a day job!), but that I believe that we as a society in general, and Christians in particular, have replaced a desire for God with a reliance on science.</p>
<p>&#8220;Science&#8221; is our new god.  And that is what I see is the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musicguy</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/comment-page-1/#comment-77965</link>
		<dc:creator>Musicguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/#comment-77965</guid>
		<description>What exactly is bad about adoption, invitro, etc?  You're going to have to expound to illustrate your point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What exactly is bad about adoption, invitro, etc?  You&#8217;re going to have to expound to illustrate your point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musicguy</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/comment-page-1/#comment-77961</link>
		<dc:creator>Musicguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/#comment-77961</guid>
		<description>How are any of the items listed below BAD knowledge?  You're going to have to expound a bit to illustrate your point.

Foster care 
Adoption 
Fertility Clinic 
In-Vitro Fertilization 
Sperm Banks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How are any of the items listed below BAD knowledge?  You&#8217;re going to have to expound a bit to illustrate your point.</p>
<p>Foster care<br />
Adoption<br />
Fertility Clinic<br />
In-Vitro Fertilization<br />
Sperm Banks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/comment-page-1/#comment-77959</link>
		<dc:creator>bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/#comment-77959</guid>
		<description>Musicguy, not all knowledge is good knowledge.  Hence the Tree of knowledge of good and evil...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Musicguy, not all knowledge is good knowledge.  Hence the Tree of knowledge of good and evil&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Musicguy</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/comment-page-1/#comment-77947</link>
		<dc:creator>Musicguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 17:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/#comment-77947</guid>
		<description>Regardless of faith and belief in god, I have a difficult time with the "sit back and wait" mentality.  Could it be that the technology and other approaches to infertility are god's way of answering prayers?  I think it's very presumptuous of a believer to insist that god answer in a specific, perhaps more "bibilical" way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of faith and belief in god, I have a difficult time with the &#8220;sit back and wait&#8221; mentality.  Could it be that the technology and other approaches to infertility are god&#8217;s way of answering prayers?  I think it&#8217;s very presumptuous of a believer to insist that god answer in a specific, perhaps more &#8220;bibilical&#8221; way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buffy</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/comment-page-1/#comment-77945</link>
		<dc:creator>Buffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/11/10/in-the-bible-it-was-considered-being-barren/#comment-77945</guid>
		<description>Sarah and Rachel did not have the faith to wait for God to act.  They pressurised their husbands to have children with their women servants so they could be surrogate mothers.  I'm not sure much has changed except we try different ways to get what we want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah and Rachel did not have the faith to wait for God to act.  They pressurised their husbands to have children with their women servants so they could be surrogate mothers.  I&#8217;m not sure much has changed except we try different ways to get what we want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
