<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Children: A Blessing and a Responsibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/</link>
	<description>Standing in the Gap in a Society that's Warring with God.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: MInTheGap</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77839</link>
		<dc:creator>MInTheGap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 21:10:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/#comment-77839</guid>
		<description>It all depends on the birth control.  I don't have a problem with barrier but I do with the pill in that I believe that the pill kills a fertilized egg-- but that, to me, is a different discussion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It all depends on the birth control.  I don&#8217;t have a problem with barrier but I do with the pill in that I believe that the pill kills a fertilized egg&#8211; but that, to me, is a different discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77837</link>
		<dc:creator>bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/#comment-77837</guid>
		<description>I agree completely.  Convictions will be different for different people, and many people are not convicted to give up birth control.  

I also believe that we can be convicted by man, and it can be tricky to discern the difference sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely.  Convictions will be different for different people, and many people are not convicted to give up birth control.  </p>
<p>I also believe that we can be convicted by man, and it can be tricky to discern the difference sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MInTheGap</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77833</link>
		<dc:creator>MInTheGap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 20:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/#comment-77833</guid>
		<description>I'm not sure that conviction is always the same for each person.  If you check out Romans 14 you'll see that God allowed religious liberty in Christ-- such that a component of our pleasing God was the reasoning behind an action.  In the Romans context, a person could please God by eating meat, or by not eating meat.  He could please God by respecting a day and by not respecting a day.

God can call people to give up certain things that are fine and acceptable to accomplish His goal at a given time.  Those that are called to the jungles as missionaries sometimes give up creature comforts.  Others have been called to temporarily give up their children or their desires only to have God meet them later.

I don't think it's necessarily a "call in two different directions" as much as it is a baseline with someone called to greater heights.

Is taking a land for God a priority?  No-- God's chosen land isn't the U.S..  However, God does have a priority on reaching the world with the Gospel so one could take it to say that our children could be the best witness that we have and the more we have the greater the opportunity we have to influence the next generation for Christ...  It's an interesting thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that conviction is always the same for each person.  If you check out Romans 14 you&#8217;ll see that God allowed religious liberty in Christ&#8211; such that a component of our pleasing God was the reasoning behind an action.  In the Romans context, a person could please God by eating meat, or by not eating meat.  He could please God by respecting a day and by not respecting a day.</p>
<p>God can call people to give up certain things that are fine and acceptable to accomplish His goal at a given time.  Those that are called to the jungles as missionaries sometimes give up creature comforts.  Others have been called to temporarily give up their children or their desires only to have God meet them later.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s necessarily a &#8220;call in two different directions&#8221; as much as it is a baseline with someone called to greater heights.</p>
<p>Is taking a land for God a priority?  No&#8211; God&#8217;s chosen land isn&#8217;t the U.S..  However, God does have a priority on reaching the world with the Gospel so one could take it to say that our children could be the best witness that we have and the more we have the greater the opportunity we have to influence the next generation for Christ&#8230;  It&#8217;s an interesting thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77831</link>
		<dc:creator>bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/#comment-77831</guid>
		<description>With conviction, it seems like an either/or.  God doesn't usually convict people to do *opposites*.  Either you use birth control or you don't.  Either you homeschool or you don't.  I can't imagine God convicting my family to eat healthy, and then telling another family to  eat junk. (But I wouldn't have imagined that He'd ask Hosea to marry an adulterer either.)

I realize that God has given grace to some women to raise up hands full of children, but to say that every woman (or family) is called to this is to add ideas to scripture, as far as my understanding goes.

And is taking back the land really God's priority for us?  This is a very Evangelical way of thinking these days, but is it Biblical?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With conviction, it seems like an either/or.  God doesn&#8217;t usually convict people to do *opposites*.  Either you use birth control or you don&#8217;t.  Either you homeschool or you don&#8217;t.  I can&#8217;t imagine God convicting my family to eat healthy, and then telling another family to  eat junk. (But I wouldn&#8217;t have imagined that He&#8217;d ask Hosea to marry an adulterer either.)</p>
<p>I realize that God has given grace to some women to raise up hands full of children, but to say that every woman (or family) is called to this is to add ideas to scripture, as far as my understanding goes.</p>
<p>And is taking back the land really God&#8217;s priority for us?  This is a very Evangelical way of thinking these days, but is it Biblical?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MInTheGap</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77826</link>
		<dc:creator>MInTheGap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/#comment-77826</guid>
		<description>And that there was my question-- where is it sin and where is it conviction.  Because I can certainly understand the logic of those that are Quiver-Full-- and I support their decision, I'm just not sure how it applies on a grand scale.

On the one hand, if all Christian families popped out 10 or 12 babies then we would be able to take back this land pretty easily.  I think back to the story of Moses-- and the Pharaoh wanted to kill the babies for that precise purpose: There were too many of them, and they'd soon take over.

Along the lines of that logic, it would make a lot of sense for good Christians to have many children.  But could I get a conviction some other way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that there was my question&#8211; where is it sin and where is it conviction.  Because I can certainly understand the logic of those that are Quiver-Full&#8211; and I support their decision, I&#8217;m just not sure how it applies on a grand scale.</p>
<p>On the one hand, if all Christian families popped out 10 or 12 babies then we would be able to take back this land pretty easily.  I think back to the story of Moses&#8211; and the Pharaoh wanted to kill the babies for that precise purpose: There were too many of them, and they&#8217;d soon take over.</p>
<p>Along the lines of that logic, it would make a lot of sense for good Christians to have many children.  But could I get a conviction some other way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77763</link>
		<dc:creator>bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/#comment-77763</guid>
		<description>That's a good article.  I was actually thinking about history *way* before the Protestant/Catholic Reformation, but it's still a good article.  

I completely agree with your point on how the church (and the world) see children.  I have four and they treat me like I'm insane.  

I have a problem with the legalism that is attached to this  "major issue."  It is a major issue, and when women are encouraged (or convinced) that it is God's way to completely ignore our bodies' cycle and procreate as often as we can to bear as many children as we can, it can cause some serious harm.  

And that's not even getting into the people who believe this so black and whitely that they look down on those of us who think (and believe, and are lead) differently. 

It's about conviction.  And if I have learned anything through the refining I've been through in the last year, it is that conviction for one does not equal sin for another.  You, Jess, might be a little more gracious than the "quiver-full" people that I've been around, but as a majority, it's their way or the high-way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a good article.  I was actually thinking about history *way* before the Protestant/Catholic Reformation, but it&#8217;s still a good article.  </p>
<p>I completely agree with your point on how the church (and the world) see children.  I have four and they treat me like I&#8217;m insane.  </p>
<p>I have a problem with the legalism that is attached to this  &#8220;major issue.&#8221;  It is a major issue, and when women are encouraged (or convinced) that it is God&#8217;s way to completely ignore our bodies&#8217; cycle and procreate as often as we can to bear as many children as we can, it can cause some serious harm.  </p>
<p>And that&#8217;s not even getting into the people who believe this so black and whitely that they look down on those of us who think (and believe, and are lead) differently. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s about conviction.  And if I have learned anything through the refining I&#8217;ve been through in the last year, it is that conviction for one does not equal sin for another.  You, Jess, might be a little more gracious than the &#8220;quiver-full&#8221; people that I&#8217;ve been around, but as a majority, it&#8217;s their way or the high-way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess @ Making Home</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77761</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess @ Making Home</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 16:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/#comment-77761</guid>
		<description>Actually, regardless of what society as a whole has done, Catholics and Protestants alike have a LONG history of neither avoiding children nor aborting them.  It was not until this last century that either group (Protestants) changed their doctrine on this issue.  Here's an article about it:

It's called: "Children of the Reformation: A Short &#038; Surprising History of Protestantism &#038; Contraception"

http://touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=20-04-020-f

Christians have a history of interpreting the Bible as saying that children are to be received freely from the hand of God, until, conveniently, it became seen as overwhelmingly "inconvenient" to have children (this last century).

And Bonnie, I think you either misread or have misunderstood my words.  I have not, nor will I, make this into a "black and white" issue.  I have admitted that there may be legitimate reasons why a couple might choose to limit God's blessings in this area of their lives.  I'll not repeat what I wrote above.  

But I will say this: FAR too many Christians nowadays pray about miniscule things (from wanting a good deal on the new car they "need", to praying for a good drive into work this morning, to asking the Sunday school class to pray about little Susie's report card this semester), but do not even THINK to pray to God about this major issue.  

Sadly, the church MOST often sees children the same way the world does-- as a burden, an inconvenience, a drain on the wallet, a frustrating distraction from real life, or an impossible annoyance.  And obviously (to quote you), that really bothers me.

I will continue to encourage any women within my sphere of influence to prayerfully and carefully consider this issue in light of God's Word and God's high view of children.  I'm not one who makes it a black and white issue, but I will seek to bring it up as an issue for consideration by everyone I can influence.

Respectfully,
Jess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, regardless of what society as a whole has done, Catholics and Protestants alike have a LONG history of neither avoiding children nor aborting them.  It was not until this last century that either group (Protestants) changed their doctrine on this issue.  Here&#8217;s an article about it:</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called: &#8220;Children of the Reformation: A Short &#038; Surprising History of Protestantism &#038; Contraception&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://touchstonemag.com/archives/article.php?id=20-04-020-f" >http://touchstonemag.com/archi.....0-04-020-f</a></p>
<p>Christians have a history of interpreting the Bible as saying that children are to be received freely from the hand of God, until, conveniently, it became seen as overwhelmingly &#8220;inconvenient&#8221; to have children (this last century).</p>
<p>And Bonnie, I think you either misread or have misunderstood my words.  I have not, nor will I, make this into a &#8220;black and white&#8221; issue.  I have admitted that there may be legitimate reasons why a couple might choose to limit God&#8217;s blessings in this area of their lives.  I&#8217;ll not repeat what I wrote above.  </p>
<p>But I will say this: FAR too many Christians nowadays pray about miniscule things (from wanting a good deal on the new car they &#8220;need&#8221;, to praying for a good drive into work this morning, to asking the Sunday school class to pray about little Susie&#8217;s report card this semester), but do not even THINK to pray to God about this major issue.  </p>
<p>Sadly, the church MOST often sees children the same way the world does&#8211; as a burden, an inconvenience, a drain on the wallet, a frustrating distraction from real life, or an impossible annoyance.  And obviously (to quote you), that really bothers me.</p>
<p>I will continue to encourage any women within my sphere of influence to prayerfully and carefully consider this issue in light of God&#8217;s Word and God&#8217;s high view of children.  I&#8217;m not one who makes it a black and white issue, but I will seek to bring it up as an issue for consideration by everyone I can influence.</p>
<p>Respectfully,<br />
Jess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77758</link>
		<dc:creator>bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 15:18:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/#comment-77758</guid>
		<description>Jess, historically women have known what it means when their cycle is off.  And historically women have known how to deal with it.  Just as in this country (long ago) no one really knew quite when a baby is "a baby" while in the womb- historically they didn't either.  If a woman missed her period, and desired to take some herbs, she could have.  I seriously doubt it was a "black market" thing, considering a common knowledge of herbs. I  imagine the stigma was not there as it is (and rightly so) today.  

Each and every child we have is a blessing, but that doesn't equate to have as many as you can.    People make this a black and white thing when it is not, and obviously that really bothers me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jess, historically women have known what it means when their cycle is off.  And historically women have known how to deal with it.  Just as in this country (long ago) no one really knew quite when a baby is &#8220;a baby&#8221; while in the womb- historically they didn&#8217;t either.  If a woman missed her period, and desired to take some herbs, she could have.  I seriously doubt it was a &#8220;black market&#8221; thing, considering a common knowledge of herbs. I  imagine the stigma was not there as it is (and rightly so) today.  </p>
<p>Each and every child we have is a blessing, but that doesn&#8217;t equate to have as many as you can.    People make this a black and white thing when it is not, and obviously that really bothers me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77741</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 03:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/#comment-77741</guid>
		<description>Just had to quickly comment and commend Jess and Mama Archer for sharing their hearts on this! Wow. I loved your comments, Jess, on how "finances" can never be a good excuse for birth control. 

Zinger!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just had to quickly comment and commend Jess and Mama Archer for sharing their hearts on this! Wow. I loved your comments, Jess, on how &#8220;finances&#8221; can never be a good excuse for birth control. </p>
<p>Zinger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bonnie</title>
		<link>http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/comment-page-1/#comment-77731</link>
		<dc:creator>bonnie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.minthegap.com/2007/10/29/children-a-blessing-and-a-responsibility/#comment-77731</guid>
		<description>Oh boy.  Here we go.  I honestly didn't read any of the comments.  People get so legalistic about these kinds of topics, it drives me batty.  Father God just brought my husband and I out of the "Vision Forum" type of legalism that says, "if you don't follow our convictions you are in sin."  That is legalism, friends, and following the path of the Pharisees.

But about birth control (and natural ways to avoid pregnancy is the same thing)...God gives us responsibility.  We have minds, right?  Lets use them! We are responsible for buying a house, paying the bills, buying and cooking food, buying, sewing and mending clothes, washing our children, loving them, driving them around, the list could go on forever.  Why all of the sudden does the Bible clearly say we have no responsibility in baby-making? 

It is wrong to put pressure on people to "have faith" in this area.  No child is born without God's help, but God gives us the grace to know when our "quivers are full."  Even if you believe birth control is wrong wrong wrong, that is your conviction.  It is not spelled out in the Bible, so stop pressuring people to do things that God has not prepared them for. 

jumping off my soapbox, now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy.  Here we go.  I honestly didn&#8217;t read any of the comments.  People get so legalistic about these kinds of topics, it drives me batty.  Father God just brought my husband and I out of the &#8220;Vision Forum&#8221; type of legalism that says, &#8220;if you don&#8217;t follow our convictions you are in sin.&#8221;  That is legalism, friends, and following the path of the Pharisees.</p>
<p>But about birth control (and natural ways to avoid pregnancy is the same thing)&#8230;God gives us responsibility.  We have minds, right?  Lets use them! We are responsible for buying a house, paying the bills, buying and cooking food, buying, sewing and mending clothes, washing our children, loving them, driving them around, the list could go on forever.  Why all of the sudden does the Bible clearly say we have no responsibility in baby-making? </p>
<p>It is wrong to put pressure on people to &#8220;have faith&#8221; in this area.  No child is born without God&#8217;s help, but God gives us the grace to know when our &#8220;quivers are full.&#8221;  Even if you believe birth control is wrong wrong wrong, that is your conviction.  It is not spelled out in the Bible, so stop pressuring people to do things that God has not prepared them for. </p>
<p>jumping off my soapbox, now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
