Archive for February, 2005

Tsunami photos

I guess the thing that has made the greatest impact on me today has to be the tsunami photos that were recently discovered. To catch you up, this couple was vacationing in the area over the Christmas holiday. They were calling home every day. In one picture, it shows them embracing.

Following the pictures chronologically, the next one shows some people running and playing on the beach with the tsunami wave in the background. The next picture shows no land, just water– that was the last picture.

The couple’s wrecked camera was found by a missionary with ABWE on the beach. The camera was unusable, but the memory card was not. When they plugged it into a PDA, they saw the pictures and tried to find the family.

They later reunited the only record of what happened to their parents with the children, which provided a sense of closure, as well as some interesting footage.

I find it amazing that someone would have taken that last picture, but the person who found the camera said that there was no where that they could have fled to, and by the time the water was at that point, they would have known that they were not going to make it.

If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Balaam, Talking Donkeys, and Lives Worth Saving

Kind of a mixed bag today.

Last night’s reading covered
the section in Numbers where the king of the Midianites tries to get
Balaam to curse the children of Israel.  One wonders what relationship
Balaam has with God in that God would bless/curse people through him,
and speak to him the way he does.  On first glance, I would think that
Balaam was one of those Gentiles that knew God.  The commentary in my
Bible implies that he is not, and so I would have to do some study to
come to a decision on that one…

Regardless, it’s nice to
see that Balaam cannot curse the Israelites.  In fact, he can only
bless them.  However, and this is not obvious in this passage for it is
told later on, Balaam does give some advice to the king.  He tells the
king to have his people intermarry with the Israelites, for their
downfall would be start following after another god, in which case the
Lord would attack Israel.

I find this instructive to us in
our lives.  Surely, having a good wife was not a bad thing, but when
they married wives that were not Israelites, they were taken down a
path to destruction.  What things do we have in our lives that may not
be bad in and of themselves, but tend to lead us into wrong things?

I find I have to mention Terri Schaivo and her case down in Florida. 
Can someone explain to me why her “husband” is seeking to have her tube
pulled out?  I mean, there’s a lot of logical problems here:

  • He obviously isn’t concerned about the moral problem of divorce, since he’s living with another woman with whom he has children.
  • He wouldn’t need to be burdened with caring for his wife, since her parents have volunteered to do it.
  • Yet he’s spending a lot of money trying to terminate his wife’s life.

I can only see a few reasons:

  • Somehow
    he thinks that if he divorces his wife, he won’t get all the settlement
    money he won when she got into this condition and he pleaded for the
    moeny because that would be what it would take to keep her alive!
  • Someone
    behind the scenes is forcing the issue because they want approval for
    right to die legislation (something akin to Roe v. Wade, where they
    found someone so they could try to make a case).
  • This man is a egomainiac who can’t stand that he lost.

None of these seem to make a good case for why this woman’s life (or
horrifying death) is hanging in the balance.  I pray that some sense is
introduced in that court, and that logic and mercy prevail.

What to Say?

Well, I’m sorry for my absence, but it seems that my family has gotten, and is still dealing with, all sorts of strains of viruses, and Virtuous Blonde and I have been trying to keep fevers down and fight the stuff ourselves. Needless to say, it’s been taking up most of our days…

How do people around you treat “the will of God.” To me, it seems like this phrase is getting abused and misused in Christianity today. I think Christians have started using this as a “catch-all”– a response to two basic problems:

  1. We use the “will of God” to mean something that is out of our control. An example of this is when someone dies, an “act of God” happens, or something that we didn’t pray for or didn’t expect happened.
  2. We use the “will of God” to add weight to an argument. This phrase is invoked as kind of an easy escape from an argument, or as kind of the “I got you, you’re not going to have a comeback to this one!” response.

I was recently perturbed at the latter use when someone said that it was the “will of God” that I attend a conference last weekend. I was not planning on it, due to the amount of time I’ve had to put into things other than being the husband/father I need to be. Furthermore, it was about this time that my children started having their colds, and I would not have imagined leaving my wife with all of that while I was off “growing”.

Was it the “will of God” that I go? I don’t believe so– otherwise I should be rebuked, and repent and maybe not be a church leader since I obviously didn’t follow God’s will. It was, I believe, God’s will that I was with my family, as evidenced by the hardship that they went through. Neither is it not God’s will not to go to a conference because you are sick. And, lastly, if we take the argument that it was to its extreme, I should never work, because I can probably find a conference somewhere, or a speaker somewhere, and I should attend.

But I digress… My point is, I think we as Christians are getting extremely lazy. We only use the phrase when it suits us, and usually as a catch all. God has a will or a method for all of our interaction– be it in our meetings, in our services, in our everyday lives– but you don’t catch us talking about the “will of God” then. We’re content to have our own will, unless we can’t convince another of it, or our will is thwarted.

My question to you is– is what you do your will or God’s? Are you in the process of making your will His? Do you consider His will in decisions– even the small ones– and what will you do differently if you don’t?

Levitical Law

I just finished Leviticus last night in my reading through the Bible. 
It’s hard to imagine anyone ever committing some of those sins while
you’re reading it.  It may be because we think of past times as more
moral.  Certainly, those that promote all sorts of immorality (from
homosexuality to abortion) believe that these thoughts have come as a
result of a more enlightened era.  Unfortunately for them, they are
nothing new, but something very old.

So, that’s brings us to the question, why all of these laws?  I mean,
there are laws in Leviticus about not wearing clothing of mixed
threads, etc.  Certainly some of the laws were for sanitary purposes. 
Those laws that talk about not using something that has had blood touch
it, or other bodily discharge, unless it’s washed, have an
understanding of germ theory way before their time.

In other
cases, especially in the sexual realm, you see phrases like “causes
confusion” or other statements, which clearly could be an understanding
of genetics, but also an understanding of human nature.  Our “old man”
lusts to do those things that are neither healthy or wise.

But I think that there is a further reason, and I think this is bourne
out in the concluding chapters of Leviticus.  It is that God wanted His
people to be a testimony, and by taking out those things that would not
make his people the best, He was preparing them for greatness.

We can sit around all day and discuss whether or not a homosexual
couple or a single mom can parent.  The obvious answer is yes, it
happens.  But is it the best?

We can discuss whether people
should have the right to take illegal drugs, smoke, have tattoos and
piercings all over their bodies– but what is the best for them?

We can discuss abortion, euthanasia, and all of the facets of capital
punishment, but what is the best for all people– not just the
individuals.

We can even discuss prostitution, like we have at times in the past, but what is the best place for sex?

I think you are beginning to see my point.  It’s easy to say “I should
be allowed” but it’s much harder to say “this is the best for me.”  I
believe that if we examined our beliefs, our actions, and our
relationships with this test, we’d find that a lot of those
“convictions” amount to folly.

Are we looking for Christ’s Return?

Continuing on the theme from yesterday, a few days ago Mona Charen wrote an article entitled Moyers and the Party of Gloom
This article starts out saying that the liberal Moyers is exaggerating,
but then she makes this statement:  “Now Moyers has a degree from the
Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, so he must know that the
people who believe the rapture is imminent are very few.”  Really,
Mona? 

I believe that the Southern Baptist Convention
believes that the rapture is immenent, as well as most fundamental
baptists and a lot of pentacostals.  Like the figure she quotes, 59%
believe that Revelation will literally happen.  Immenent meaning that
there is nothing that needs to happen before Christ gathers us to
Himself and performs his judgements on the Earth.

Now, this
does not mean that we shouldn’t be earthly minded, which is the point
she tries to make with the site giving money to the Tsunami victims. 
God commanded us to be ready for His return, but He also put us here to
spread the Gospel, give a cold cup of water in His name, and to take
care of the Earth.

I would like to focus in on both side,
Charen and Moyers.  Both of them make a good observation about the
state of Christianity and their beliefs on what will happen and when it
will happen.  Christians live like Christ is not going to return, as
Charen points out.  We don’t live this minute like it would be our
last, or that we would be before God soon.  And yet, there are radicals
that throw off all to follow someone who believes that he knows when it
will happen.

Christians have to find a balance, true, but
that balance must have an upward and longing look to Christ’s return.  
That’s the only way we’ll have impact!

Flickering Light

‘Frenzy’s post was a good one yesterday talking about how people that we agree with politically we may not always agree with in the case of religion. My comment to him was that we have to take the criticism, and if it’s applicable we have to adjust. If not, we can let it roll of our backs.

Ellen Ratner’s piece Waffling Towards Gomorrah claims that the President hasn’t totally been firm on his resolve for a constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage. This is understandable. The support in the congress is limited, the states are doing a good job changing their constitutions to fix the problem, and the DOMA (Defence of Marriage Act) has been upheld– so far.

The problem is that while all these things are positives in defending our traditional marriage system, there are things like the case in Utah where the Supreme Court of that State are using the ruling in Lawrence v. Texas to say that there shouldn’t be a law banning bigamy/polygamy.

Far from this being a civil rights issue, this is a moral issue. No one is denied the ability to marry. A gay person is no denied the ability to marry a person of the opposite sex. (Even the governor of New Jersey McGreevy can attest to that!) Furthermore, the fallacious logic that I should be allowed to marry a same sex partner can be applied to anything. Personally, I’m waiting for the couple where the wife says that her husband is “married to his job” and then forces the man to get “divorced” from said job, and then seeks half the company’s profits during the time that he was “married to his job!”

Now, one can argue very well that maybe government should get out of the marriage license business all together, since it is a act of “holy matrimony.” I could also argue that government is too entangled in it, and it promotes the general welfare, so there’s a reason to recognize legitimate marriages.

I could go on, and may at some other time, but my objections to Homosexual marriage have been well documented on this blog. Point being, marriage is a God-ordained institution designed for one man and one woman to be terminated at death. Homosexuality is an abomination unto the Lord.

Ratner ends her column, however, on a point that we do need to take to heart. Why is it that so many churches have problems with their members separating or divorcing? That’s something that hurts the church’s testimony and witness. Until she gets this right, the church will constantly be attacked as hypocritical, and though the Word of Lord is holy and can stand on its own, its followers are the only light that some see.

Committing a Sin in Ignorance

In reading through the beginning of Leviticus, you find an interesting
set of sacrifices.  They’re interesting for a number of different
reasons:

For starters, can you imagine bringing a sacrifice in where you had to
kill the animal you brought because you sinned?  The ceremonies
surrounding the beginning of the sacrifices had blood all through it. 
It was placed on the priests, it was placed on the alter, and it was
poured out at the base of the alter.  This wasn’t just any ‘ole lamb
from the flock either, it was the best.

Then there’s all the
different rules about how to offer, what to offer, what sex of what to
offer, who participated in the offering, and what you were offering
for: peace, sin, wave, heave, etc…  If Moses had Microsoft Word,
there would no doubt have been a handy table to index all these things,
instead we have it in prose.

What struck me most in reading
through was the fact that there were sacrifices there for sins that a
person committed in ignorance.  Whether it was because no person could
remember to keep all the law, or that we all sin no matter if we know
it or not, there was a sacrifice for it.

That begs the
question, how are we doing at confessing the sins we don’t even know we
do to God?  How are we at responding to sin that is exposed by the Holy
Spirit.  God does not have an ex post facto provision on sin.  Whether you committed it and knew it was wrong or not, it’s the same thing.

If you need, take time today to thank God for His forgiveness, and
thank Him that He forgives even the sin you are not aware that you’ve
committed!

What I'm Doing...

Posting tweet...

Powered by Twitter Tools.

coComment.com Comments from MInTheGap

ss_blog_claim=42df328052202abe05bbf2039ff9e2dc